The legal troubles of Jude Okoye, the former manager of the defunct music group Psquare, have deepened as he remains in custody while awaiting a crucial bail ruling. A Federal High Court in Ikoyi, Lagos, on Friday, adjourned his bail application hearing to March 3 after he was arraigned on multiple charges of laundering N1.38 billion, $1 million, and £34,537.59. The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, which brought the charges against him, alleged that he used illicit funds to purchase an N850 million property in Ikoyi while also channeling over $1 million through a bureau de change.
Jude Okoye, who pleaded not guilty to the charges, was arraigned alongside his company, Northside Music Ltd, on a seven-count charge before Justice Alexander Owoeye. His legal team, led by Inibehe Effiong, requested that he be allowed to remain in EFCC custody pending the court’s decision on his bail application. The prosecution counsel, Larry Peters Aso, strongly opposed this request, arguing that EFCC facilities were already overcrowded and insisting that Okoye be transferred to the Ikoyi Correctional Facility. The prosecution also contended that Okoye posed a flight risk, emphasizing the need for strict bail conditions.
The courtroom proceedings took an unexpected turn when singer Paul Okoye, popularly known as Rudeboy, appeared in court to stand as a surety for his elder brother. Paul, who was visibly emotional, submitted legal documents to the court, hoping that his presence and status would help secure Jude’s temporary release. The judge acknowledged the submission but stated that the bail ruling would be delivered on March 3. Meanwhile, the trial has been scheduled to commence on April 14, raising further speculation about the fate of the former Psquare manager.
The allegations against Jude Okoye have sparked widespread reactions, with many Nigerians questioning the depth of financial misconduct in the entertainment industry. Some believe that celebrities often escape full prosecution despite being accused of money laundering and fraud, while others see the EFCC’s handling of the case as an example of selective justice. The case has also reignited discussions about the longstanding internal rifts within the Okoye family, particularly following Paul Okoye’s bold claim that their brother Peter Okoye was responsible for Jude’s legal troubles. His statement has intensified speculation about unresolved tensions between the Psquare brothers, whose highly publicized disputes led to their split and later reconciliation.
Beyond the family drama, the case has drawn attention to the wider issue of financial irregularities within Nigeria’s entertainment sector. Industry observers argue that the lavish lifestyles of some artists and executives often raise questions about the sources of their wealth, yet few cases lead to convictions. The EFCC has vowed to intensify its crackdown on financial crimes involving celebrities, but many Nigerians remain skeptical about whether high-profile figures like Jude Okoye will face the full weight of the law or if the case will eventually be swept under the rug.
As the legal battle unfolds, the upcoming bail ruling on March 3 will determine whether Okoye remains behind bars or secures temporary freedom while facing trial. His supporters are hopeful that the court will grant bail, while the prosecution is determined to keep him in custody until a final verdict is reached. With billions of naira at stake and family tensions now playing out in the public eye, the case has captivated the attention of Nigerians, fueling debates about justice, celebrity influence, and financial accountability.
Stay informed with the latest news from Nigeria and beyond. Join us on WhatsApp or Telegram for real-time updates. Have a report or article? Send it to report@trendingnaijanews.com. Follow us on X (Twitter), Instagram, LinkedIn, YouTube, TikTok, and Facebook for more updates.